
If you’ve been following Cardano for more than five minutes, you know the running joke. Great tech, very principled, peer-reviewed everything... but also kind of just sitting by itself at lunch while Ethereum and Solana were out making friends. For years, ADA holders had to explain why their chain was “building” while everyone else was “doing.” That conversation is getting a lot easier now.
On February of 2026, Charles Hoskinson announced that LayerZero is being integrated into the Cardano ecosystem, sharing the groundbreaking partnership for the first time.
So what does this actually mean? Let’s break it down without putting you to sleep.
Cardano runs on something called the eUTXO model. Think of it like Bitcoin’s architecture but with smart contracts bolted on. It’s secure, it’s predictable... but it does not play nicely with account-based chains like Ethereum. Interoperability has always been kind of a mess, and Cardano has largely sat on the sidelines of the cross-chain party.
LayerZero approaches this challenge differently. It uses a messaging layer to send verified messages between chains, rather than relying on complex token-wrapping structures that are often targeted by hackers. That’s a big deal. No more sketchy wrapped tokens, no more liquidity scattered across isolated pools, and no more depending on some centralized bridge that could get exploited at 3am on a Tuesday.
That design reportedly opens access to around $80 billion in omnichain assets already connected through LayerZero standards. Eighty. Billion. Dollars. Let that number sink in. Got the gravity of it? Let's move on.
LayerZero’s Omnichain Fungible Token standard sits at the core of the integration. The framework lets assets exist natively across several blockchains. It removes that need for wrapped tokens and avoids splitting liquidity across separate pools, a problem that I mentioned earlier But it's important enough to state twice. That structure gives more than 700 existing tokens a path onto Cardano and Cardano on to them.
Cardano can now communicate with Ethereum, Solana, and over 160 other networks. For developers, that’s a completely different building environment than what existed just a few months ago.
This LayerZero integration didn’t just come out of nowhere, it’s part of a coordinated push by what’s being called the Pentad. The Pentad includes the Input Output Group (IOG), Cardano Foundation, EMURGO, Intersect, and the Midnight Foundation. Five organizations, one shared mandate: to finally stop arguing about roadmaps and start shipping. A move that was seen by many in the ecosystem as a breath of fresh air. Well, everyone except the trolls on X that seem to relish in FUD in hopes that Elon may send them a big enough check to move out of their mom's basement. I won't mention the names, but I am sure you know who they are.
And the Pentad has shipped, despite the current market trend. Oracle integration via Pyth Network improves price data reliability, analytics availability through Dune Analytics increases transparency and data access, and cross-chain messaging via LayerZero lays groundwork for interoperability. That’s not a wishlist anymore, those are done.
Then there’s USDCx. It addresses a separate infrastructure need by bringing a tier-one stablecoin rail tied to Circle, giving Cardano a recognizable settlement asset for payments, DeFi activity, and real-world asset flows. Hoskinson described it as better than regular USDC because it adds privacy and is immutable and irreversible, you can move straight from a wallet to Coinbase or Binance with instant convertibility. He said Cardano went from signing a deal with Circle to having USDCx live on the network in 84 days, calling it the number one stablecoin on Cardano already. 84 days. That’s actually fast for anyone, let alone a blockchain project.
Is this all enough? Honestly. It depends who you ask. Hoskinson argued the effort has moved Cardano from being “an island” to being connected to the broader crypto market, but added that the ecosystem still needs strategic capital deployment to help applications survive and compete. Infrastructure is the foundation, not the house. Developers still need to build, users still need to show up, and liquidity still needs to actually flow... not just theoretically exist.
But for a chain that’s spent years being told it’s “all potential, no product,” this is a meaningful shift. A very welcome moment for those here who believe in Cardano's potential. The rails are finally there. What gets built on them is the next chapter. And that next chapter could get very interesting.

This is the launch that the blockchain industry has spent years waiting for. The Midnight network has announced that mainnet is live, and with this groundbreaking moment, something that no previous generation of blockchain has managed to deliver: end-to-end programmable privacy that is flexible, enforceable, and built for the real world. After years of research, development, and collaboration involving scientists, engineers, developers, and institutional partners across the globe, the fourth generation of blockchain technology is officially here.
The timing could not feel more significant. Within days of the mainnet going live, Midnight confirmed what may be the most consequential real-world blockchain deal announced in years. Monument Bank, a Bank of England-regulated institution serving over 100,000 clients with more than 7 billion pounds in savings deposits, announced plans to tokenize up to 250 million pounds of retail customer deposits directly on the Midnight network. Those deposits remain interest-bearing, fully backed in sterling, and protected under the UK's Financial Services Compensation Scheme. It is the first time a UK-regulated bank has ever moved retail deposits onto a public blockchain, and it happened at the exact moment Midnight's mainnet came to life.
Charles Hoskinson, founder of Input Output Group and the visionary behind Midnight and Cardano, was candid about the scale of what this represents. Writing on X following the Monument announcement, he called it "one of the largest deals we've ever done" and said it could bring "hundreds of millions to billions of TVL" to the Midnight ecosystem. More striking is what Monument Technology plans to do next: offer the same tokenized deposit infrastructure to other banks through a Banking-as-a-Service platform.
To understand why this launch matters so much, it helps to understand what came before it. Hoskinson has framed Midnight's arrival in the clearest possible terms: Satoshi gave us sound money, Ethereum gave us programmability, Cardano brought interoperability and governance, and Midnight "gives us our identity and privacy back." Each generation solved the limitations of the last. Midnight is solving the biggest one remaining.
The world's value has stayed off-chain for a reason. Trillions of dollars in real estate, private equity, debt, and currency cannot be digitized on transparent public ledgers without exposing the sensitive data that institutions and individuals depend on keeping private. Midnight changes that equation fundamentally. Its hybrid ledger architecture combines public and private data, allowing applications to process and verify sensitive personal, financial, and commercial information without ever exposing it to the network. Zero-knowledge proofs are generated locally on a user's device and submitted for validation, meaning identity, credit, and compliance verification can all happen on-chain with the underlying data never leaving the user's hands.
The tokenomics are equally well-designed for mainstream adoption. Midnight operates on a dual-component model: NIGHT, the governance and utility token, and DUST, the renewable resource used to power transactions. NIGHT holders generate DUST over time, and developers can hold NIGHT to cover transaction costs for their users entirely. For the first time, end-users can interact with a blockchain-powered application without ever needing to hold or even be aware of a crypto token. That is not a small thing. That is how you build for a billion users.
The caliber of institutions that signed on to run Midnight's founding federated nodes is genuinely unprecedented for a blockchain launch. Google Cloud, MoneyGram, Vodafone's Pairpoint division, eToro, Blockdaemon, Bullish, Worldpay, AlphaTON Capital, and Shielded Technologies are all running live infrastructure on the Midnight network right now. This is not a list of logos on a website. These entities are producing blocks on a live, production blockchain.
Consider what each of those names brings. Blockdaemon secures over 110 billion dollars in digital assets across networks globally. MoneyGram operates payment infrastructure spanning more than 200 countries and territories, and is already exploring how private on-chain payments can flow across that entire footprint. eToro carries more than 35 million registered users. Google Cloud brings enterprise-grade infrastructure and Confidential Computing capabilities backed by Mandiant security monitoring. Hoskinson put it plainly at launch: "For the first time, organisations of this scale have committed not only to running critical infrastructure but also to building and deploying live applications on a public network."
The rollout is structured in phases, which reflects how seriously the Midnight Foundation is taking stability and security at this stage. The current Kukolu phase establishes the operational foundation. The Mohalu phase, targeted for Q2 2026, will bring in Cardano stake pool operators and activate the DUST Capacity Exchange, beginning the move toward broader decentralization. Full cross-chain interoperability with networks including Ethereum and Solana is planned for the Hua phase in Q3 2026. This is a network being built to last, not rushed to market.
What makes Midnight's privacy architecture so significant is that it has been designed from the ground up for regulated environments. This is not a privacy coin. Midnight is not trying to make transactions untraceable. What it delivers is something far more powerful for institutional adoption: the ability to prove facts about data without revealing the data itself. KYC status, solvency, eligibility, and settlement completion can all be verified on-chain while the underlying customer records remain completely shielded from public view.
The scale of the opportunity this unlocks is staggering. Aleo's 2025 Privacy Gap Report found that approximately 1.22 trillion dollars in institutional stablecoin transaction volume currently moves through on-chain rails, with just 0.0013% of that settling on privacy-enabled infrastructure. The gap has not existed because institutions lack interest. It has existed because no compliant privacy tooling was available. Midnight is the tooling. The Monument deal is the proof.
Midnight Foundation President Fahmi Syed captured the broader vision at launch: "When privacy is built into the system itself, it becomes possible to bring real-world activity and assets on-chain without exposing the underlying data, unlocking entirely new forms of economic value that were previously impossible on transparent infrastructure." That is not marketing language. It is a description of what the Monument deal already demonstrates in practice.
Midnight arrived at its genesis block with one of the broadest token holder bases in blockchain history already in place. The Glacier Drop distribution attracted participants from across eight major blockchain ecosystems, with over 3.5 billion NIGHT tokens claimed. A second phase, the Scavenger Mine, drew over 8 million unique wallet addresses, setting an industry record for distribution volume. NIGHT is now live on Kraken, OKX, Binance, Bitpanda, and a growing list of exchanges, and gained around 5% in the days immediately leading up to the mainnet launch as the momentum built.
The developer community has also been building with real urgency. The Midnight Summit hackathon in November 2025 brought together over 120 builders working on privacy applications across healthcare, AI, governance, and finance. Smart contract deployments on the Preprod network surged 1,617% in November alone. Midnight's Compact smart contract language, a domain-specific language built on familiar TypeScript syntax, is already enabling developers to build ZK-powered applications without needing years of cryptographic expertise. The technical barrier to building on Midnight is lower than it has ever been for any privacy-focused network.
There is a real sense across the space that something genuinely new has arrived. Hoskinson's generational framing resonates because the history backs it up. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Cardano each opened doors that the previous generation could not. Midnight opens the door to the world's real economy, the trillions in assets that have remained off-chain because no infrastructure could protect them adequately. That door is now open. The genesis block has been written, the institutional partners are live, the first bank deal is signed, and the ecosystem is just getting started. The dawn of Midnight is here.

Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin issuer, has hired KPMG, one of the Big Four accounting firms, to conduct its first full audit of its USDT reserves. It has also engaged PwC to support the preparation of its internal systems.
The move comes days after Tether announced plans to work with one of the Big Four firms on an inaugural audit of its stablecoin reserves. Although it did not initially name the firm, the Financial Times reported that KPMG had been selected, citing sources familiar with the matter.
Prior to now, Tether had, for several years, engaged BDO Italia, an Italian affiliate of the global accounting firm BDO, to conduct periodic attestations of its reserves. These attestations involved BDO Italia taking a point-in-time snapshot of Tether's USDT reserves.
These snapshots helped confirm that, at a specific date, Tether's reported assets, including cash, U.S. Treasuries, gold, Bitcoin, and secured loans, met or exceeded the circulating supply of USDT. They were conducted quarterly and also included details on Tether's profit, reserve composition, and excess reserves.
While these attestations provided a degree of transparency and accountability, they were not full, comprehensive audits, as they relied on agreed-upon procedures and did not include elements typically associated with a full audit, such as in-depth testing of internal controls, continuous transaction verification, and formal risk assessments.
Apart from ensuring transparency, the audit of its reserves aligns with Tether’s U.S. expansion goals under the GENIUS framework for stablecoins.
Signed into law by President Trump on July 18, 2025, the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act establishes a federal regulatory framework for dollar-backed payment stablecoins.
The framework outlines requirements that must be met by stablecoin issuers operating in the United States, including:
Tether, in partnership with crypto bank Anchorage Digital, launched USAT, a dollar-pegged stablecoin designed to comply with the GENIUS Act, as part of efforts to expand its presence in the U.S. market under the GENIUS framework.
The launch provides Tether with immediate regulatory cover, potentially making the asset more attractive to U.S. institutions that have previously avoided offshore-issued stablecoins such as USDT. Because USAT is issued by Anchorage Digital, a U.S.-based company, it has been positioned as a “made in America” product—marking a significant step in Tether’s broader U.S. expansion strategy.
Since comprehensive reserve audits are among the requirements for stablecoin issuers seeking to operate in the U.S., the KPMG audit helps position Tether as compliant with U.S. standards.

Onchain sleuth ZachXBT has accused stablecoin issuer Circle of improperly freezing 16 hot crypto wallets. The freeze is reportedly linked to an ongoing civil case in the United States, but ZachXBT said the company failed to conduct adequate due diligence before taking action.
“An analyst with basic tools could have identified, within minutes, that these were operational business wallets from the thousands of transactions they process,” he said.
According to ZachXBT, the wallets were used for business purposes. “I reviewed the onchain activity, and the exchanges, casinos, and forex businesses do not appear to be related to one another,” he added.
The crypto investigator also criticized the judicial process that approved the freeze, calling it the “most incompetent” he has seen in more than five years of work in the field.
“The NY civil case is sealed and they have provided absolutely ZERO basis to freeze all of these business addresses. [...] The expert witness is liable. The judge is liable. Circle is liable,” Zach said. “This is what happens when you outsource your freezing decisions to literally any random federal judge instead of having a process,” he added.
Following the callout by the on-chain investigator, Circle reportedly unfroze one of 16 wallets. According to Zach, the wallet with the address "0x61f…e543," which holds 130,966 USDC and is linked to Goated, has been unfrozen. He expects more wallets to be unlocked soon.
The crypto community reacted with outrage, with many criticizing centralized stablecoins. “This is your 10th reminder that centrally issued stablecoins are not actually yours. They can be frozen, unlike cash,” said Mert Mumtaz, CEO of Helius Labs.
“I still find it hard to believe that token issuers can 'freeze' coins on EVM shitchains and call it a 'normal' feature. The CBDC is already here, and it's called USDC,” said Francis Pouliot, CEO of crypto platform Bull Bitcoin.
Like many centralized stablecoin issuers, Circle has a history of freezing crypto assets. In May 2025, it froze approximately $57 million in USDC linked to the memecoin project LIBRA, as well as 2,997,180 USDC held in an Ethereum address flagged for suspicious activity.
Most of these freezes were legally justified and are part of Circle's efforts to curb money laundering and other illicit activities on the blockchain.
However, some critics have raised concerns about centralization, noting that centralized stablecoin issuers can freeze users' crypto assets at their discretion, a clear departure from the user control promised by blockchain technology.

The UK government has imposed a moratorium, or temporary ban, on cryptocurrency donations in politics following findings from an independent review.
Commissioned by UK Secretary of State Steve Reed in December 2025, the Rycroft review, led by former Permanent Secretary Philip Rycroft, investigated “foreign financial influence and interference in UK politics.”
The findings of the review, published on Wednesday, highlighted how active hostile states are attempting to influence UK democracy and identified political crypto donations as a vulnerability. Since such donations are difficult to trace, the review recommended a temporary ban or moratorium on political crypto contributions.
Following a recommendation from the Rycroft Review for a ban on political crypto donations, the UK government has announced a moratorium on political cryptocurrency contributions. The ban, which takes immediate effect, was confirmed by Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
"I can tell the House we will act decisively to protect our democracy. That will include a moratorium on all political donations made through cryptocurrencies," Starmer said during Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday.
Prime Minister’s Questions. Image credit: Youtube
In a statement on its official website, the UK government said British citizens living abroad will face an annual cap of £100,000 on donations and on regulated transactions, including loans. The government said the measure aims to "protect the country's democracy from the scourge of foreign actors and financial influence."
Although the ban is already in effect as a temporary measure, the Representation of the People Act will need to be amended for it to become permanent law. The Representation of the People Act is a UK law that governs how elections are conducted, who can vote, and how political parties operate, including rules on donations and campaign financing.
Once the amended bill passes both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, it will be sent to King Charles III for royal assent. On becoming a law, political entities will have a 30 day deadline to return any political crypto donations received during the moratorium period.
"Once the legislation comes into force, political parties and regulated entities, such as candidates and MPs, will have 30 days to return any unlawful donations received in the interim, after which enforcement action may be taken, the UK government wrote on its website."
This moratorium comes amid calls from top politicians in the country who have long sought a ban on political crypto donations, notable among whom are Parliament member Rushanara Ali, Matt Western, Labour MP and committee chair, among others.

Balancer Labs, the core team behind the decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol Balancer, has announced plans to wind down after a $116 million exploit that occurred in November.
The decision, according to CEO Marcus Hardt, was driven by the impact of the hack. Despite continuing to generate revenue, Balancer Labs’ economic model was no longer sustainable in the aftermath of the hack.
“We were spending too much to attract liquidity relative to what that liquidity was actually generating in revenue,” Hardt said. “We were diluting BAL holders to sustain a system that, in my view, was no longer serving the protocol well. At some point, you have to be honest about that.”
With Balancer Labs winding down its operations, the protocol is expected to be managed by the Balancer Foundation and its decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), an approach supported by co-founders Hardt and Fernando Martinelli.
DAO members have been asked to vote on a proposal to restructure the protocol and its tokenomics. If approved, BAL emissions will end, all fees will be routed to the treasury, and the protocol’s share of swap fees will be reduced. The team size will also be cut.
So, while Balancer Labs, the core development team, is winding down, the protocol will continue operating under new management with a leaner structure.
On November 3, 2025, Balancer Protocol suffered a smart contract exploit targeting its V2 composable stable pools, resulting in the theft of significant amounts of cryptocurrency.
Although Balancer had a permission system in place, a bug in the smart contract allowed the attacker to bypass these controls. The attacker exploited the vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to the protocol’s shared vault system, enabling them to drain assets from multiple liquidity pools across different blockchains simultaneously.
The hack had a severe impact on Balancer, causing its total value locked (TVL) to drop from about $775 million to $258 million within days of the exploit, according to a report. Its native token, BAL, also fell by about 30%.
The shutdown of the Balancer Labs team comes weeks after crypto aggregator Step Finance announced its own shutdown following a January 31 hack that reportedly led to losses of between $26 million and $40 million from the protocol’s treasury.
Bunni, a decentralized liquidity protocol built on Uniswap V4, also shut down around October last year after suffering a hack that resulted in losses of about $8.4 million.

Resolv Labs’ stablecoin, USR, has lost its U.S. dollar peg following an exploit of the token’s contract that allowed attackers to mint millions of tokens.
The exploit, which occurred on March 22, 2026, resulted in the creation of 50 million unbacked USR tokens, prompting the team to temporarily pause the protocol’s functions to prevent “further malicious actions.”
According to YieldsandMore, which first reported the story, the attack began with a 100,000 USDC deposit by the attackers, ultimately causing USR to lose its dollar peg and fall to $0.01.
After minting the USR tokens, the attackers converted them into wrapped USR (wstUSR) to access deeper liquidity on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). This allowed them to offload large amounts of wstUSR more gradually, reducing the risk of an immediate price crash of USR.
The next phase of the attack involved dumping and selling wstUSR tokens across multiple platforms, including KyberSwap and Velora. Using this method, the attackers swapped wstUSR for USDt and USDC, which were then aggressively converted into Ether (ETH).
Although the attack was first made public by the crypto research and analysis group YieldsandMore, the Resolv team was only able to pause the protocol three hours later.
“It took ResolvLabs three hours to pause its protocol. Roughly one hour of that delay came from the gap between submitting the multisig transaction and collecting the four required signatures to execute it,” YieldsandMore wrote on X.
While 50 million tokens were initially minted by the attackers, blockchain security company PeckShield reported that an additional 30 million USR tokens were later minted, bringing the total to approximately 80 million.
The minting and dumping of USR tokens triggered a severe depeg, sending its price from $1 to roughly $0.02 to $0.05 within minutes, a decline of about 95 to 97%.
Although it briefly rebounded to between $0.14 and $0.20, USR is currently trading at $0.2773, according to data from CoinMarketCap at the time of publication.
The USR depeg ranks among the most severe in recent history, second only to the collapse of Terra's TerraUSD (UST) in 2022, which fell from $1 to $0.02 and lost 98% of its value. Iron Finance also had its IRON stablecoin lose its dollar peg, dropping from $1 to about $0.05.

For most of the past decade, the conversation around artificial intelligence and crypto stayed largely theoretical. Two industries, both moving fast, both attracting enormous capital, but mostly running on parallel tracks. That started to change in late 2024, and by early 2026 the overlap had become hard to ignore. MoonPay, the crypto payments firm that built its name on fiat-to-crypto on-ramps, is now positioning itself as the financial infrastructure layer for a future where AI agents don't just analyze markets but actively participate in them.
On February 24, the company officially launched MoonPay Agents, a non-custodial software layer built on top of MoonPay CLI, its developer-focused command-line interface. The product gives autonomous AI systems the ability to generate wallets, fund them through fiat on-ramps or crypto transfers, execute on-chain trades, and convert holdings back to fiat, all without requiring a human to approve each individual step. Less than three weeks later, on March 13, MoonPay followed up with a second announcement: a deep integration with Ledger, the hardware wallet maker, designed to let users sign off on AI-initiated transactions directly from a physical device.
MoonPay CEO Ivan Soto-Wright put it bluntly in the launch statement: "AI agents can reason, but they cannot act economically without capital infrastructure." The line is a bit pithy, but it captures the actual gap. Building a bot that can identify an arbitrage opportunity across three chains is a solved problem in 2026. Building one that can act on that opportunity, fund itself, execute the trade, and off-ramp the proceeds into a bank account without exposing private keys or requiring a human babysitter is not.
MoonPay Agents is designed to close that gap. The setup is relatively straightforward: a developer installs MoonPay CLI, a user completes a one-time KYC verification, funds a wallet, and grants the agent permission to transact within defined parameters. After that initial handshake, the agent can operate independently. Wallets are non-custodial and stored locally on the user's device using OS keychain encryption. Private keys never leave the machine. Spending limits and pre-execution transaction simulations serve as guardrails against runaway agents doing something unintended.
The product ships with 54 tools across 17 categories, covering most of what a developer building a financially active agent would actually need. That includes real-time cross-chain swaps, recurring buy schedules, portfolio tracking, token discovery and analysis, multi-chain deposit links with automatic stablecoin conversion, fiat funding via virtual accounts that accept bank transfers, Apple Pay, Venmo, and PayPal, and the ability to off-ramp back to traditional currencies from the terminal.
Multi-chain coverage at launch spans Ethereum, Solana, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, BNB Chain, Avalanche, TRON, and Bitcoin. Over 100 tokens are supported. Developers can also extend the platform with custom skills. The system is compatible with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok, and can be accessed via the CLI, a local Model Context Protocol server, or a web chat interface.
One detail that has caught the attention of developers in the agentic AI space is native x402 support. The x402 protocol, introduced by Coinbase in May 2025, revives the long-dormant HTTP 402 status code to enable machine-to-machine payments using stablecoins, with no API keys or subscriptions required. An agent simply pays for a resource or service at the time of access. MoonPay's inclusion of x402 compatibility positions MoonPay Agents within the emerging standard that Stripe, QuickNode (which extended x402 support across more than 80 chains), and a growing number of infrastructure providers have rallied around.
MoonPay Agents is not architected for one or two bots. The infrastructure is built to support thousands, eventually millions, of agents running concurrently across use cases that range from trading and portfolio management to gaming economies, commerce automation, and corporate treasury operations.
The Ledger Integration
MoonPay's solution was to bring Ledger into the loop. By integrating Ledger's Device Management Kit into the CLI wallet for MoonPay Agents, the company now allows every AI-generated transaction to be routed through a physical hardware device for approval. The agent constructs and proposes the transaction. The user confirms it on the Ledger. Private keys never touch the software layer at any point.
MoonPay says this makes the CLI wallet the first agent-focused wallet to support Ledger's secure signing through the Device Management Kit. Soto-Wright put the strategic framing plainly: "Autonomous agents will manage trillions in digital assets. But autonomy without security is reckless. We built MoonPay Agents with Ledger so intelligence can scale without surrendering control. The agent executes. The human stays in the loop."
Ledger's chief experience officer, Ian Rogers, acknowledged that the partnership reflects a real shift in what wallet infrastructure needs to support. "There is a new wave of CLI and agent-centric wallets emerging," he said, "and these will need Ledger security as a feature, too." It is a meaningful endorsement from a company whose entire value proposition is built on the premise that hardware is the only storage you can actually trust.
The model that results from the integration is structurally similar to two-factor authentication in traditional finance: the AI handles the analytical and execution work, but physical confirmation is required to release funds. Even a fully compromised software environment cannot move money without the physical Ledger device and its PIN.
For developers building agents that need to touch money, the practical implications of MoonPay Agents are fairly direct. The product abstracts away most of the hard parts: custody, key management, fiat connectivity, cross-chain routing, compliance. A single CLI install and a one-time user verification is genuinely all that stands between a developer and an agent that can fund itself, trade across chains, and off-ramp back to a bank account.
The ability to add custom skills also matters. MoonPay Agents ships with 54 tools across 17 categories, but the open extension model means developers can build on top of the existing toolkit rather than working around its edges. That kind of extensibility is usually what determines whether a platform becomes a default or a footnote.
What remains to be seen is how the ecosystem grows around it. MoonPay has the infrastructure and the user base. The question now is whether developers building the next generation of agentic applications pick MoonPay Agents as their default financial layer, or whether a competitor, or a collection of open standards, fills that space instead.
It is worth stepping back from the product details for a moment to consider what MoonPay is actually doing here. This is not a company adding AI features to an existing payments product. It is a payments company making a deliberate bet that the financial system is about to acquire a new class of participant, one that is not human, that will require infrastructure designed specifically for machine-speed, machine-scale capital movement, and that will need to be anchored to compliant fiat rails if it is ever going to interact with the broader economy.
That bet is not obviously wrong. Stablecoin volumes are growing at rates that would have seemed implausible even two years ago. Agent tokens and AI-driven trading systems are proliferating faster than most infrastructure providers anticipated. The convergence of AI and crypto, long discussed in the abstract, is becoming a concrete engineering problem that real companies are being paid to solve.
MoonPay's move is a claim that it has already built most of what that future requires, and that the work of this moment is connecting those existing rails to the autonomous systems that will run on them. It is an ambitious claim. The next 18 months will do a lot to determine whether it holds up.

The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has warned crypto users about a fake token on the Tron blockchain impersonating the agency.
In a post on its New York X account, the FBI said some Tron users have received messages from scammers posing as the agency, asking them to complete an anti-money laundering verification to avoid having their assets frozen and falsely claiming their wallets are under investigation.
The FBI cautioned against falling for such scams. “If you receive a token from an account with the details below, do not provide any identifying information to any website associated with the token,” the agency said.
Users who have already sent their personal information to the scammers were urged to file a complaint with the Internet Crime Complaint Center.
The launch of the fake FBI token is one of several crypto phishing scams that have emerged in recent months. These scams often involve impersonating recognized government agencies, companies, or public figures, tricking users into giving up their personal credentials.
According to Scam Sniffer, about 106,106 victims were affected by crypto phishing scams in 2025, resulting in losses of approximately $83.85 million.
Although this represents a significant drop compared to the $494 million in losses and 332,000 victims recorded the previous year, phishing remains widely used by attackers, especially with the growing use of AI-generated phishing campaigns.
In 2024, the FBI created a fake artificial intelligence–related token, called NexFundAI, an Ethereum-based cryptocurrency designed to catch scammers.
The NexFundAI token was part of Operation “Token Mirrors,” launched to identify and expose fraudulent market makers and manipulators, including those involved in wash trading and pump-and-dump schemes.
The operation was successful, as it led to the arrest of more than 18 individuals and the seizure of several million dollars from the suspects.

A Bitcoin wallet holding 2,100 BTC (worth over $147 million) became active after more than 13 years of dormancy.
The wallet, identified by the address 1NB3ZXx…BQB6ZX, moved 0.00079 BTC (approximately $55.71) at 11:27 a.m. UTC on Friday, a tiny fraction of its total holdings. According to data from Bitinfocharts, the wallet received the 2,100 BTC in a single transaction on July 4, 2012.
At the time, Bitcoin was trading at $6.59, valuing the holdings at about $13,839. The wallet’s value has since increased by more than 10,000x, rising to over $147 million today.
Image credit: Bitinfocharts
This move did not go unnoticed in the crypto community, with many applauding the whale’s patience and others calling it one of the most effective trading strategies.
“13.7 years of silence… just to move $56. That’s not a sell signal — it’s a reminder of what conviction looks like in Bitcoin. From $6 to $75,000, the biggest returns didn’t come from trading… they came from time,” said Andy Wang, CEO of crypto platform HashWhale.
This isn’t the first Bitcoin whale wallet to be reactivated this year. In January, a 13-year-old dormant wallet moved 909 BTC, worth about $85 million, to a new address.
About a week ago, another Bitcoin whale that had been dormant for roughly two years transferred 343 BTC, worth approximately $23.85 million, between Binance and Cobo.
Despite experiencing significant volatility this month, Bitcoin has posted a net positive month-to-date gain.
Starting the month at around $67,000, Bitcoin dipped to $65,303 before surging to $74,000 days later, and was trading at $69,927 as of March 10. It also reached a peak of $75,988, with some analysts speculating about a potential breakout above $80,000.
According to data from CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin is currently trading at around $69,807, with a 24-hour trading volume of approximately $39 billion and a market capitalization of nearly $1.396 trillion.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has dropped its two-year case against Nader Al-Naji, founder of the blockchain-based social media platform BitClout.
The stipulation of dismissal was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and, according to the US regulator, the dismissal was based on a reassessment of evidentiary records.
Since the dismissal was issued with prejudice, the SEC will not be able to file the same charges against Al-Naji or any of the relief defendants named in the case, including his wife, mother, or any companies associated with him.
However, the SEC cautioned against treating the dismissal as a precedent for other cases. “The Commission’s decision to exercise its discretion and seek dismissal of this litigation is based on the particular facts and circumstances of this case and does not necessarily reflect its position on any other case,” it said.
Reacting to the dismissal, Nader Al-Naji, founder of BitClout, described the initial lawsuit as unreasonable. “In the coming days and weeks, I will be hopping on some podcasts to tell the whole story,” Al-Naji said.
On July 30, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a civil lawsuit against Al-Naji. The regulator alleged multiple complaints against him, including offering unregistered securities. According to the SEC, Al-Naji failed to register BTCLT, BitClout’s native token, which he sold to investors, raising over $257 million from its sales.
The SEC also accused Al-Naji of fraud and misrepresenting the use of investor funds, claiming he spent more than $7 million on luxury properties in Beverly Hills and extravagant cash gifts for family members.
In addition to the SEC’s civil case, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) alleged that Al-Naji committed wire fraud by misleading investors about the use of their funds, leading to his arrest in July 2024. However, these criminal charges were later dropped.
The dismissal of the BitClout case is one of several recent SEC case dismissals, particularly since the start of the Trump administration.
In January 2026, the SEC jointly dismissed its lawsuit against Gemini Trust Company and Gemini Earn. The regulator had initially alleged that Gemini Earn offered unregistered securities but dropped the charges without imposing penalties.
In 2025, the SEC voluntarily dismissed its case against the blockchain platform Dragoncoin, which it had accused of making misrepresentations. The case was closed with prejudice, and no penalties were imposed.

Former U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson has called Bitcoin a Ponzi scheme, claiming it has far less value than gold and even Pokémon cards, which he said are more widely recognized.
In a recent Daily Mail article, former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson called Bitcoin a Ponzi scheme with no real value, saying it relied on a “supply of new and credulous investors.” He also shared the story of a friend who lost about $26,000 in a crypto investment scam.
Johnson shared a story about a retired man from a village in Oxfordshire who initially handed over £500 (about $661) to someone who promised to double the money through Bitcoin investments. Johnson said the man went on to invest £20,000 (around $26,450) over three and a half years but ultimately received nothing in return.
The former prime minister also questioned the credibility of Bitcoin, calling it “a string of numbers stored in a series of computers.” “Who can we turn to if someone decrypts the crypto?” Johnson asked. “There’s no one except Nakamoto, who might be nothing more than Pikachu or Charmander.”
Since the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, lacked institutional backing, Johnson questioned Bitcoin’s credibility as a tradable asset. According to Johnson, Pokémon cards, which fascinated children thirty years ago and still do today, are a more tradable asset than Bitcoin.
“These curious little Japanese cartoon beasties hold the same fascination for five-year-olds as they did 30 years ago. The kids are obsessed with them. They boast and squabble about them,” Boris said.
“Even if you remain pretty impervious to the charm of Pikachu, you can just about see why a decades-old Pikachu card is still a tradeable asset,” he added.
While many social media users have ridiculed Boris’ understanding of cryptocurrency, some have offered clearer explanations of why Bitcoin cannot be called a Ponzi scheme.
Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, also sought to clarify the issue.
“Bitcoin is not a Ponzi scheme. A Ponzi requires a central operator promising returns and paying early investors with funds from later ones,” Saylor wrote on X.
“Bitcoin has no issuer, no promoter, and no guaranteed return—just an open, decentralized monetary network driven by code and market demand,” he added.