Whatever optimism had crept back into crypto markets over the past two days got wiped out Thursday morning after President Trump's primetime address to the nation offered not a path to peace, but a harder line. Crypto fell. Stocks fell. Oil surged past $106. The familiar cycle repeated itself, for roughly the fifth or sixth time in five weeks.

 

Bitcoin dropped 3% to around $66,000, giving back the gains it had quietly built on Tuesday. Ethereum fell by a similar margin, sliding to $2,056. BNB shed 4.9% to $580, XRP lost 3.5% to $1.30, and Solana's SOL had the worst session of the major tokens, off 5.2% and now down roughly 13% on the week. It was an ugly morning across the board, and it felt awfully familiar.

 

A Rally Built on Hope, Not Reality

Tuesday had been, briefly, a good day. Trump had made offhand comments suggesting the Iran conflict could wrap up within weeks and that a formal deal was not necessarily a prerequisite for a resolution. That was enough. Asian equities surged 4%. S&P 500 futures climbed. Bitcoin pushed back toward $69,000. The crypto Fear and Greed Index, which had been pinned at single digits for weeks, got a bit of air.

 

Then came the Wednesday speech. In nearly 20 minutes, Trump outlined no real shift in Iran policy, offered no pathway to a ceasefire, and gave no timeline for reopening the Strait of Hormuz, the critical oil shipping lane that has been effectively closed since mid-March. He said the strait would reopen 'naturally' once hostilities subside. That was not what markets had priced in and our small rally just went away.

 

The Real Problem Underneath the Headlines

Analysts and traders increasingly point out that tracking Trump's daily commentary on Iran may be beside the point. The underlying oil market situation has been quietly deteriorating, independent of whatever the president says on any given afternoon. The International Energy Agency's member nations authorized the largest coordinated strategic petroleum reserve release in the organization's 50-year history, around 426 million barrels in total, to compensate for the near-shutdown of Hormuz flows. Those flows represent about 20% of the world's seaborne oil trade.

 

The problem is that those emergency reserves are expected to run dry within weeks. When that happens, the manageable shortfall of roughly 4.5 to 5 million barrels per day could balloon to 10 or 11 million, which would be an entirely different kind of crisis. Ship insurance premiums for Hormuz transits remain elevated. Tanker traffic through the strait has not recovered. The real-world picture, independent of political statements, is not improving.

 

Going Nowhere Fast

Bitcoin has essentially traded between $60,000 and $73,000 for the entirety of the conflict, now entering its sixth week. It sells off on escalation headlines, bounces on de-escalation headlines, and ends up more or less where it started. The Fear and Greed Index has been stuck between 8 and 14 for a month, deep in extreme fear territory. The pattern has become almost mechanical at this point.

 

There are some who see reasons for cautious optimism, and they are not entirely without basis. April has historically been one of Bitcoin's stronger months, finishing green in 10 out of 15 years with an average gain of around 20.9%. Bitcoin also bounced clearly off two-month uptrend support near $60,000 last week and is attempting to reclaim its 50-day moving average. Spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen roughly $2.5 billion in net inflows over the past month, a sign that institutional interest has not collapsed. BlackRock noted this week that large investors are concentrating specifically in Bitcoin and Ether rather than spreading into the broader altcoin market.

 

But seasonality does not trade against a war. Until the conflict itself shows signs of genuinely unwinding, the pattern of hope, headline, reversal is unlikely to change. Wednesday was just another reminder of that.

 

The next few weeks will likely be decisive, not because of anything Trump says, but because of what happens with oil supply fundamentals that have been quietly building toward a breaking point regardless of the diplomatic noise.

 

Jack Dorsey's Square has rolled out Bitcoin payments for millions in the United States. Starting March 30, Bitcoin payments are now switched on by default for millions of eligible U.S. sellers on the platform, no opt-in, no lengthy setup, no technical expertise required. For a lot of small business owners, they may not even notice it happened until a customer tries to pay with BTC at checkout.

 

Block, Square's parent company, confirmed the rollout through a post on X, telling merchants they can now "start accepting bitcoin that instantly converts to cash at checkout, with no additional setup." The shift builds directly on the Square Bitcoin initiative the company announced in late 2025, but this time it is not optional infrastructure sitting in the background. Bitcoin acceptance is now baked into the payment stack that millions of American businesses already use daily for point-of-sale, inventory and payroll.

 

 

Zero Fees, Instant Settlement, No Volatility Risk

Square is making it as easy as possible for businesses to integrate Bticoin payments. When a customer pays in Bitcoin, the transaction settles near-instantly via the Lightning Network and converts to U.S. dollars at the moment of sale. The merchant never holds BTC, never worries about the price dropping overnight and does not need to make any changes to their accounting. They just receive dollars, same as always.

 

On top of that, Square is waiving processing fees on Bitcoin payments through the end of 2026. Starting January 1, 2027, the fee becomes 1% per transaction, which is still well below what most card networks charge. For small businesses watching margins closely, that gap is not nothing. It is a real financial incentive to keep the feature on, or at minimum to not bother turning it off.

 

Miles Suter, Block's head of Bitcoin product, framed the goal plainly: making it easier for millions of businesses to accept bitcoin at scale. What he left unsaid is how unusual the default-on design actually is. Most payment processors that support crypto, including PayPal, Stripe and Coinbase Commerce, require merchants to actively enable cryptocurrency in their settings. Square has flipped that logic entirely.

 

 

The Default-On Model Could Be the Whole Story

Industry observers have zeroed in on the opt-out structure as the most consequential design choice here. Merchants who do not want to accept BTC can disable the feature through their Square dashboard. But it is on. For everyone. By default. The expectation is that most won't bother. Inertia is a powerful force in business software. If even a small fraction of Square's millions of active sellers leave Bitcoin payments on, the practical footprint of BTC in everyday commerce expands in a way that years of crypto advocacy has failed to achieve.

 

Lightspark CEO David Marcus, the former president of PayPal, was quick to call the move transformative. He compared it to the early standardization of TCP/IP, the protocol that allowed disparate computer networks to communicate through a shared standard. "Enabling Bitcoin payments at scale could mirror how TCP/IP became the foundational protocol of the internet," Marcus said. It is a big claim. But the underlying logic, that Bitcoin could become a neutral, interoperable layer for value transfer the way TCP/IP became one for data, is not a new idea. Dorsey himself has argued something similar for years.

 

 

Part of a Bigger Block Ecosystem Push

This rollout did not come out of nowhere. Block has been building toward it for a while. Through Cash App, the company already serves consumers who can buy, sell and transfer Bitcoin. Bitkey gives users a self-custody hardware wallet option. Spiral funds open-source Bitcoin development. Proto is building out mining infrastructure. Square's auto-enabled payments are the commercial layer on top of all that, the piece that ties the ecosystem to Main Street.

 

This move also arrives in a regulatory environment that, while still messy in places, is more favorable than it has ever been. The SEC has clarified guidelines for payment processors handling cryptocurrency conversions, giving companies like Square more legal certainty to act. States including Texas and Florida have moved to pass crypto-friendly legislation. Treasury Department officials have signaled support for mainstream payment integration, even as federal frameworks around transaction reporting remain a work in progress.

 

Square's feature is not available to sellers in New York State, where the regulatory picture remains more complicated. The company has not commented on a timeline for expansion there.

 

 

What Comes Next Is the Real Question

There are real unknowns here. Building the infrastructure is one thing. Getting consumers to actually choose Bitcoin at checkout, when they could just tap a card, is another. Merchant adoption, in the sense of sellers actively keeping the feature on and promoting it to customers, is not guaranteed either. And competitive dynamics are shifting. PayPal's PYUSD stablecoin is expanding across 70 markets, representing a different bet on which form of digital money wins out in everyday commerce.

 

Dorsey's position, and Block's broader strategy, is that Bitcoin's long-term infrastructure potential outweighs the short-term predictability of dollar-pegged stablecoins. The company is absorbing the volatility risk so merchants don't have to, which is essentially a sustained institutional bet on Bitcoin's direction. Whether that bet pays off will depend on whether consumers follow the infrastructure that has now been built for them. That part, nobody fully controls, but it will be interesting to watch the numbers and who is actually using this.

 

On March 27, Morgan Stanley filed Amendment No. 3 to its S-1 registration with the SEC, and buried inside was a number that caught the entire industry off guard: 14 basis points. That's 0.14% annually, the lowest management fee of any spot Bitcoin ETF currently available in the United States, Morgan Stanley is coming in hot with plans to dominate the crypto ETF field.

 

The Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust, set to trade under the ticker MSBT, will track Bitcoin's price using the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. It holds Bitcoin directly, with no leverage, no derivatives, and no structural complexity. Coinbase will serve as the prime broker and custodian, while BNY Mellon handles cash and administrative functions. The product looks almost identical to what BlackRock, Fidelity, and others already offer. The only thing really different here is the price.

 

Why Basis Points Matter

To understand why this is a big deal, you need to look at what's already out there. BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), the dominant product in the space with roughly $54 billion in assets and about 785,000 BTC under management, charges 0.25%. Grayscale's Bitcoin Mini Trust is currently the cheapest option at 0.15%. Morgan Stanley's proposed fee undercuts even that by a single basis point, putting the firm at the absolute bottom of the cost stack. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas called it a "semi-shock" on X, noting that the pricing means none of Morgan Stanley's 16,000 financial advisors would face any conflict of interest recommending the product to clients.

 

His colleague James Seyffart was even more blunt, writing that Morgan Stanley is "not messing around" and projecting a potential launch in early April 2026, pending final SEC sign-off. That timeline is looking increasingly credible. The New York Stock Exchange has already issued a listing notice for MSBT on NYSE Arca, which is one of the procedural steps that typically signals a fund is close to going live.

 

The Distribution Advantage

Here's where Morgan Stanley's play becomes something more than just a fee war. The bank's wealth management division oversees roughly $8 to $9.3 trillion in client assets, depending on who you ask. That advisor network of around 16,000 professionals is massive and, until now, has largely been directing clients toward third-party Bitcoin ETFs when they wanted crypto exposure. A proprietary fund, priced cheaper than everything else on the market, removes that friction entirely.

 

Phong Le, president and CEO of Strategy, laid out the math plainly: if just 2% of Morgan Stanley's wealth management assets rotate into MSBT, that's roughly $160 billion in potential demand. To put that in context, IBIT, the largest spot Bitcoin ETF on earth, currently holds about $54 billion. Even a fraction of Morgan Stanley's allocated potential could dwarf what any competitor has built so far.

 

Morgan Stanley's own data suggests there's room to grow internally. Amy Oldenburg, the firm's head of digital asset strategy appointed in January 2026, noted earlier this year that roughly 80% of crypto ETF activity on the platform comes from self-directed investors rather than advisor-managed accounts. That's a hefty gap, and a cheap in-house product is a pretty obvious way to close it.

 

A Huge Crypto Push

It's worth taking a step back and looking at what Morgan Stanley has been doing over the past few months, because MSBT is just one piece of a much larger pie. The firm filed for its Bitcoin ETF in early January 2026. Later that same month, it submitted applications for a Solana ETF and a staked Ether ETF. Then in February, it applied for a national trust banking charter specifically to custody digital assets and execute transactions for clients. CEO Ted Pick has engaged directly with the U.S. Treasury on product development. This looks like a company that has decided crypto is a core business and is building the infrastructure to match.

 

What This Means for the Rest of the Market

The ETF market has seen fee compression before, and it rarely ends with just one cut. When Fidelity, Schwab, and others began undercutting each other on equity index funds years ago, it triggered a prolonged race toward zero that reshaped the entire industry. Bitcoin ETFs are not quite there yet, but Morgan Stanley's move adds serious downward pressure to the cost structure. Grayscale has already been watching assets bleed from its flagship GBTC product since the January 2024 launch, with holdings dropping from roughly $29 billion to around $10 billion. Higher-cost funds tend to lose assets over time when cheaper alternatives are available. And lower barrier to entry may just push crypto-curious investor off the fence.

 

For those retail investors and the advisors who serve them, the picture is pretty clear. Spot Bitcoin ETFs all offer the same basic thing: direct exposure to BTC's price without having to hold the asset yourself. When the product is the same, cost becomes the deciding factor. And right now, MSBT is set to be the cheapest option on the shelf.

 

Whether the SEC clears the final steps before April remains to be seen. But the direction here is clear. One of the biggest names in traditional finance has looked at the $83 billion Bitcoin ETF market, decided it wants in on its own terms, and priced its entry in a way that forces every other player to respond. Are we going to see ETF price wars heating up? That seems like a good thing for everyone involved.

 

Coinbase and mortgage lender Better Home & Finance have announced a new product that lets prospective buyers use Bitcoin or USDC as collateral on a Fannie Mae-backed mortgage, without ever having to liquidate their holdings. It is, by most measures, the clearest sign yet that digital assets are finding their way into the mainstream and will be used as the machinery of American homeownership.

 

How It Will Work

Borrowers transfer their digital assets from Coinbase into a custody wallet held by Better, retaining legal ownership of the crypto throughout the life of the loan. The collateral sits there as a pledge, not a payment. For holders of USDC, Circle's dollar-pegged stablecoin, the arrangement even lets them keep earning yield on their holdings while those same assets secure the mortgage.

 

The rate premium is real, though. Borrowers should expect to pay 0.5 to 1.5 percentage points above a standard 30-year fixed loan, depending on their overall profile. Whether that spread feels worth it depends largely on how much a borrower values not triggering a taxable event by selling appreciated crypto positions. For long-term Bitcoin holders sitting on significant gains, the math can work out in their favor.

 

One of the more notable design choices here is the absence of margin calls. In most crypto lending products, a sharp price drop can trigger forced liquidation of collateral. This product is built differently. If Bitcoin falls 40% in a month, the terms of the mortgage do not change and no additional collateral is required. Liquidation risk only enters the picture after a 60-day payment delinquency, putting the structure firmly in line with how conventional mortgages work rather than how crypto lending typically operates. This matters a great deal for borrowers who have been burned by or are skeptical of DeFi-style collateral arrangements.

 

How Did We Get Here?

In June 2025, Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte issued a directive ordering Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to prepare proposals for counting cryptocurrency as an asset in mortgage risk assessments, without requiring borrowers to first convert those holdings into dollars. The directive was framed explicitly around President Trump's stated goal of making the U.S. the crypto capital of the world. Pulte's letter specified that only crypto held on U.S.-regulated centralized exchanges would qualify, and he called for risk mitigants including valuation adjustments to account for volatility.

 

Until now, Fannie and Freddie's guidelines required that any cryptocurrency a borrower wanted to use for a down payment, closing costs, or reserves had to be liquidated into U.S. dollars first. The Coinbase-Better announcement marks the first time that framework has been operationalized into an actual product backed by Fannie Mae. Whether lenders across the broader market follow suit remains to be seen, as industry experts have cautioned that adoption will be gradual. Individual lenders may impose their own overlays, and aggregators who purchase loans will need to get comfortable with the structure before it becomes truly mainstream.

 

Coinbase and Better are not alone in seeing opportunity here. Newrez, one of the largest mortgage servicers in the country with roughly $778 billion in assets under management, announced late last year that it was assessing Bitcoin and Ethereum for mortgage qualification purposes. Bob Johnson, head of originations at Newrez, described the FHFA directive as a meaningful signal from Washington that the capital markets infrastructure underpinning a significant share of U.S. mortgage origination is open for change.

 

Bitcoin ETFs have surpassed $100 billion in assets under management since receiving SEC approval in early 2024, and a growing cohort of American households hold meaningful digital asset positions. For those buyers, particularly younger, crypto-native professionals who have built wealth in digital rather than traditional asset classes, the old requirement to sell before buying a home was a genuine friction point. This product is a direct answer to that segment.

 

Questions Sill Remain

Not everyone is convinced the move is without risk to the broader housing system. A group of Democratic senators wrote to Director Pulte last July raising concerns about attaching a notoriously volatile asset class to one of the most systemically important markets in the U.S. economy. The letter questioned the transparency of the decision-making process and asked for details on how downside risks would be managed. Those concerns have not disappeared just because a product has launched.

 

Experts in the mortgage industry have echoed a degree of caution. Some analysts expect lenders to apply heavy discounts to crypto valuations for qualifying purposes, potentially treating holdings at 10% or less of market value, and to require that assets be seasoned on regulated exchanges for a defined period. The operational side of verifying, valuing, and monitoring digital assets in a mortgage context is still being developed, and few lenders have the infrastructure in place today to do it at scale.

 

Whatever the short-term practical limitations, the symbolic weight of Fannie Mae's involvement should not be understated. The government-sponsored enterprise, which has been under federal conservatorship since 2008 and underpins a substantial portion of American mortgage finance, is now part of a product that treats Bitcoin and USDC as legitimate collateral.

 

The irony here is hard to ignore. The 2008 financial collapse, driven largely by reckless mortgage-backed securities dealings, was the very event that inspired Satoshi Nakamoto to write the Bitcoin whitepaper. That invention, born as a rejection of and answer to the broken banking system, will now be used to back the same financial instrument that helped trigger the crisis. Life, as they say, comes full circle.

 

Bitcoin climbed back toward the $72,000 mark Wednesday as the derivatives market showed telltale signs of growing leverage, putting traders on alert for sharp moves in either direction. The world's largest cryptocurrency rose roughly 1.2% after midnight UTC, mirroring gains across U.S. equity futures, with the Nasdaq 100 up around 1% over the same window. BTC was last seen trading near $71,300, well within the choppy $69,000 to $76,000 band that has defined the market for much of March.

 

The session's gains carried a cautionary undertone. Futures open interest in bitcoin has climbed to a one-week high, driven in large part by short positioning rather than fresh bullish conviction. Traders who have seen BTC get turned away from $72,000 repeatedly appear to be leaning into those rejections rather than chasing a breakout. Funding rates and cumulative volume delta have stayed flat to muted, two readings that analysts typically cite when the OI build is defensive in nature rather than a signal of aggressive dip-buying.

 

$14 Billion Options Expiry Looms Large

The backdrop sharpens considerably when you factor in what is sitting on the calendar for Friday. Deribit, the dominant crypto options venue, is set to settle roughly $14.16 billion in bitcoin contracts at 08:00 UTC on March 27, a figure that accounts for nearly 40% of all open interest on the exchange. The quarterly event is the single largest derivatives settlement of Q1 2026, and it arrives with a specific price level commanding outsized attention.

 

That level is $75,000. According to Deribit, max pain for this Friday's expiry sits right there, meaning it is the price at which the highest number of contracts expire worthless and option writers, typically large funds and institutional players, would owe the least. Deribit Chief Commercial Officer Jean-David Pequignot described the dynamic as a gravitational pull, noting that delta-hedging activity by market makers historically nudges spot prices toward that pain threshold in the hours leading up to settlement.

 

The gap between where bitcoin is trading now and $75,000 is not trivial, a roughly 5% move from current levels. Whether max pain theory ultimately delivers on that gravitational pull remains a matter of debate even inside the industry. But with nearly 40% of Deribit's open interest scheduled to roll off in one session, the mechanical hedging flows alone are worth watching closely.

 

Altcoins Showing Stronger Positioning

While Bitcoin grinds sideways with mounting leverage, a more constructive picture is forming in parts of the altcoin market. Ethereum open interest has climbed to multi-month highs, and the positioning profile looks more directionally bullish than what is currently visible in BTC futures. DeFi-adjacent tokens and AI infrastructure projects are outperforming Bitcoin on a short-term basis, with the CoinDesk Computing Select Index, which tracks TAO, FET, and Chainlink, rising about 1.9% Wednesday to lead all major benchmarks.

 

Chainlink alone accounts for roughly 62% of that index and added 1.5% on the day, while TAO and FET posted gains of 4.9% and 2.9% respectively. The broader CoinDesk 20 benchmark gained around 0.9%, with the altcoin-heavy CoinDesk 80 generally outpacing the bitcoin-heavy CoinDesk 5. The pattern suggests that risk appetite has not evaporated, it is simply migrating toward names where there is clearer near-term narrative momentum.

 

A Market Trapped Between Catalysts

Zoom out and the picture gets harder to trade comfortably. Bitcoin is on pace to close March in the red, which would extend a losing or flat monthly streak to six consecutive months, the longest such run since the 2022 bear market. The final week of the month carries several potential catalysts, including the U.S. Personal Consumption Expenditures data on March 28, which could shift rate-cut expectations and send ripples through risk assets.

 

For now, the market appears to be threading a needle between a derivatives setup that could pull prices higher ahead of Friday and a macro backdrop that has not yet given bulls a clean reason to push through resistance with conviction. Rising open interest without corresponding spot demand and funding is historically the kind of configuration that resolves violently, though the direction is rarely obvious until it starts moving. With $14 billion in contracts settling in roughly 48 hours, the next few sessions aren't looking to be very quiet.

 

Bitcoin surged to $71,200 on Monday as investors are optimisitc on de-escalation of the Iran conflict.

 

The move started when President Trump posted on Truth Social that he had instructed the Department of War to postpone planned strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for five days, following what he called "very good and productive" talks with Tehran. Crypto jumped roughly 5% on the news. Ether climbed above $2,100, BNB pushed through $650, and XRP traded above $1.40. Oil plunged around 11%, S&P 500 futures gained nearly 4%, and global markets added an estimated $2.5 trillion in value within about 20 minutes.

 

Then Iran's state-affiliated Fars News Agency cited an unidentified source denying any talks had taken place. Gains started reversing almost immediately. Bitcoin is now up about 2.5% on the day and down roughly 5% on the week, sitting just under $71,000 after hitting an intraday high of $71,224 per CoinGecko data.

 

The session is the latest chapter in a conflict that has rattled crypto markets since Operation Epic Fury launched on February 28, when the U.S. and Israel struck targets across Iran and killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Iran's subsequent blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil flows, has kept energy prices elevated and risk appetite suppressed. The Federal Reserve, meeting earlier this month against that backdrop, revised its 2026 inflation forecast upward to 2.7% and signaled a higher-for-longer stance on rates.

 

Despite the chaos, Bitcoin has held above its pre-war price level, a fact that has not gone unnoticed. When the strikes began on a Saturday morning and every traditional market was closed, crypto was the only liquid venue available for investors to respond. That 24/7 trading reality, once seen as a volatility risk, has started looking more like a feature.

 

The five-day pause, if it holds at all, does not end the conflict. Iran continues to strike targets across the Gulf, and Israel would need to sign on to any broader ceasefire. Israel has publicly said it has thousands of remaining targets and requires at least three more weeks of operations. Prediction markets currently favor a ceasefire by late April at the earliest.

 

Bitcoin's 30-day implied volatility index has bounced to 60%, and $791 million in total leveraged positions have been wiped across crypto markets this session according to CoinGlass, with $425 million of those being longs. The clock on Trump's five-day window is ticking, and so is the market's patience.

 

A Bitcoin wallet holding 2,100 BTC (worth over $147 million) became active after more than 13 years of dormancy.

 

The wallet, identified by the address 1NB3ZXx…BQB6ZX, moved 0.00079 BTC (approximately $55.71) at 11:27 a.m. UTC on Friday, a tiny fraction of its total holdings. According to data from Bitinfocharts, the wallet received the 2,100 BTC in a single transaction on July 4, 2012.

 

At the time, Bitcoin was trading at $6.59, valuing the holdings at about $13,839. The wallet’s value has since increased by more than 10,000x, rising to over $147 million today.

 

Image credit: Bitinfocharts

 

This move did not go unnoticed in the crypto community, with many applauding the whale’s patience and others calling it one of the most effective trading strategies.

 

“13.7 years of silence… just to move $56. That’s not a sell signal — it’s a reminder of what conviction looks like in Bitcoin. From $6 to $75,000, the biggest returns didn’t come from trading… they came from time,” said Andy Wang, CEO of crypto platform HashWhale.

 

This isn’t the first Bitcoin whale wallet to be reactivated this year. In January, a 13-year-old dormant wallet moved 909 BTC, worth about $85 million, to a new address.

 

About a week ago, another Bitcoin whale that had been dormant for roughly two years transferred 343 BTC, worth approximately $23.85 million, between Binance and Cobo.

 

 

Bitcoin’s Price Action This Month

Despite experiencing significant volatility this month, Bitcoin has posted a net positive month-to-date gain.

 

Starting the month at around $67,000, Bitcoin dipped to $65,303 before surging to $74,000 days later, and was trading at $69,927 as of March 10. It also reached a peak of $75,988, with some analysts speculating about a potential breakout above $80,000.

 

According to data from CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin is currently trading at around $69,807, with a 24-hour trading volume of approximately $39 billion and a market capitalization of nearly $1.396 trillion.

 

 

Cryptocurrency lending firm Blockfills, along with its operating company Reliz Ltd. and two affiliated entities, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in a Delaware court.

 

According to the team, the filing was voluntary and in the best interests of the company and its customers. The decision, the firm said, was made after extensive discussions with investors, clients, creditors, and other stakeholders.

 

“This filing will allow the firm to implement an orderly restructuring while maintaining transparency and oversight through the court-supervised process,” Blockfills said.

 

 

 

"The bankruptcy filing was the best course of action after evaluating all available strategic and financial alternatives,” Blockfills said. The company now plans to restructure and stabilize the business while pursuing additional liquidity and recovery options.

 

In the filing, Blockfills estimated its assets at between $50 million and $100 million and its liabilities at between $100 million and $500 million, leaving a potential deficit of up to $450 million.

 

 

Blockfills Many Struggles 

The past few months have been tough for Blockfills. In February, the firm suspended customer withdrawals and deposits. According to the team, the move was intended to protect both the firm and its clients, given the impact of challenging market conditions on its liquidity.

 

Blockfills also suffered huge financial losses, reportedly losing about $75 million from its lending and other crypto services. The firm is facing a lawsuit from Dominion Capital, which alleges that it mishandled and commingled customers’ funds, prompting a U.S. federal judge to freeze approximately 70.6 bitcoins linked to the company.

 

 

Past Bankruptcy Cases

Blockfill isn’t the first crypto lending firm to file for bankruptcy. In 2022, Celsius Network, one of the largest crypto lenders, froze withdrawals in mid-year and later filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in July amid harsh market conditions. 

 

Court filings revealed the company had about $4.3 billion in assets and $5.5 billion in liabilities, leaving a deficit of roughly $1.2 billion. Celsius eventually shut down in February 2024.

 

Several other crypto lending companies also filed for bankruptcy in 2022, including BlockFi, Voyager Digital, Three Arrows Capital, and Hodlnaut. Some of these companies attempted to restructure and resume operations, but none succeeded, with all eventually shutting down.

 

 

Former U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson has called Bitcoin a Ponzi scheme, claiming it has far less value than gold and even Pokémon cards, which he said are more widely recognized.

 

 

 

In a recent Daily Mail article, former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson called Bitcoin a Ponzi scheme with no real value, saying it relied on a “supply of new and credulous investors.” He also shared the story of a friend who lost about $26,000 in a crypto investment scam.

 

Johnson shared a story about a retired man from a village in Oxfordshire who initially handed over £500 (about $661) to someone who promised to double the money through Bitcoin investments. Johnson said the man went on to invest £20,000 (around $26,450) over three and a half years but ultimately received nothing in return.

 

The former prime minister also questioned the credibility of Bitcoin, calling it “a string of numbers stored in a series of computers.” “Who can we turn to if someone decrypts the crypto?” Johnson asked. “There’s no one except Nakamoto, who might be nothing more than Pikachu or Charmander.”

 

Since the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, lacked institutional backing, Johnson questioned Bitcoin’s credibility as a tradable asset. According to Johnson, Pokémon cards, which fascinated children thirty years ago and still do today, are a more tradable asset than Bitcoin.

 

“These curious little Japanese cartoon beasties hold the same fascination for five-year-olds as they did 30 years ago. The kids are obsessed with them. They boast and squabble about them,” Boris said.

 

“Even if you remain pretty impervious to the charm of Pikachu, you can just about see why a decades-old Pikachu card is still a tradeable asset,” he added.

 

 

The Crypto Community Responded

While many social media users have ridiculed Boris’ understanding of cryptocurrency, some have offered clearer explanations of why Bitcoin cannot be called a Ponzi scheme.

 

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, also sought to clarify the issue.

 

“Bitcoin is not a Ponzi scheme. A Ponzi requires a central operator promising returns and paying early investors with funds from later ones,” Saylor wrote on X.

 

“Bitcoin has no issuer, no promoter, and no guaranteed return—just an open, decentralized monetary network driven by code and market demand,” he added.

 

 

 

Crypto brokerage company Blockchain.com is expanding into Ghana after recording strong growth one year after entering the Nigerian market.

 

In a recent announcement, Owenize Odia, General Manager for Africa at Blockchain.com, said the company plans to expand into Ghana. 

 

According to the announcement, the move was driven by the company’s strong growth in Nigeria. Just one year after entering the market in early 2025, Blockchain.com reported more than a 700% increase in brokerage transaction volume, with Bitcoin, Tether, and Tron emerging as the most traded crypto assets in the region. 

 

The decision to fully launch into Ghana’s crypto market was also driven by the strong momentum in the country. According to Owenize, Blockchain.com recorded a 140% increase in the number of active users in Ghana and a 90% increase in transaction volumes even before the company officially entered the market. 

 

Crypto Adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa

Sub-Saharan Africa is now the third-fastest-growing region globally for crypto adoption, according to a report by Chainalysis, after Asia-Pacific and Latin America. 

 

According to the report, about $205 billion was received by Sub-Saharan African countries between July 2024 and June 2025 in Sub-Saharan Africa, a 52% increase year over year, with Nigeria leading adoption in the region and accounting for about $92 billion of the total volume received within that period. Cross-border transfers, remittances, and stablecoin transactions accounted for most of these transactions.

 

Image credit: Chainalysis

 

About Blockchain.com

Founded in 2011 by Peter Smith, Benjamin Reeves, and Nicolas Cary, Blockchain.com is one of the oldest cryptocurrency platforms in the world. It offers a suite of crypto services, including non-custodial crypto storage, cryptocurrency trading, blockchain exploration, and the trading of tokenized U.S. stocks and exchange traded funds (ETFs).

 

Since its founding, Blockchain.com has achieved several notable milestones, including:

• Creating nearly 94 million wallets for users.
• Serving customers in more than 100 countries.
• Processing over $1 trillion in total transaction volume, including more than $100 million in a single day. 

 

 

An X user with the username "Sillytuna" has reportedly lost $24 million in Aave Ethereum USDC (aEthUSDC) in an attack that involved a combination of violence, sexual assault, weapons, and threats to life.

 

 

"Bruised, held off while I could, but can't do that much with axes over your hands and feet," Sillytuna wrote. The user further stated that he was, at this point, done with crypto. In his words, "And now... definitely out of crypto ****ers."

 

While the matter has already been reported to law enforcement, no official statement has been issued by the authorities. However, the X user has announced a 10% bounty for whoever helps recover the stolen funds.

 

 

 

How the Crypto Community Reacted

Shortly after the news went viral, the crypto community reacted with mixed feelings, with many commiserating with the user over their loss. Some also raised awareness about the deplorable state of security in the United Kingdom. Apparently, the victim is a UK resident.

 

 

Amid the sympathy from the global crypto community, some, however, doubted the authenticity of the victim's story.

 

According to YokaiCapital, an X user, the victim had not posted anything about crypto before. He also alleges that the victim's account appears to have been bought recently.

 

"He will probably shill the coin at some point or say that he will take donations from the coin," YokaiCapital went on to write. 

 

However, the victim has denied allegations that he intentionally wanted to trend and claims the stolen funds were long-term holdings.

 

 

How the Attackers Moved the Stolen Funds

Tracking the stolen funds, blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence said that the attackers moved the funds across Layer 2 networks, Bitcoin, and Monero, obviously to evade trail.

 

 

 

Roughly $20 million of the stolen funds were stored in two Ethereum addresses as DAI, a stablecoin on the Ethereum network, while $2.48 million was bridged to USDC on Arbitrum.

 

Arkham reported that the attackers sent $2.47 million to Hyperliquid through 19 separate Wagyu accounts, which were used to convert the funds to Monero (XMR).

 

The attackers also bridged $1.1 million to the Bitcoin blockchain using LiFi, noting that 0.5 BTC was deposited into a mixing service, Arkham added.

 

 

 

Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds have attracted roughly $1.7 billion in net inflows since February 24, ending a prolonged stretch of redemptions and renewing confidence that institutional buyers are stepping back in.

 

The reversal has been sharp. After months of steady outflows, nearly every major U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF is now recording net positive flows for 2026. That matters because ETF flow data has become, more than any other metric, the closest thing to a real-time read on institutional sentiment toward Bitcoin.

 

BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) is doing most of the heavy lifting. On March 4 alone, IBIT absorbed $306.60 million, roughly 66% of that day's total inflows across all spot Bitcoin products. Since February 24, BlackRock has accumulated a net 21,814 BTC through the fund, valued at approximately $1.55 billion at current prices. Year-to-date, IBIT has added around $300 million in capital even as Bitcoin itself fell about 16% over the same period.

 

The timing is notable. Bitcoin has traded around $72,000 this week, bouncing from lows near $60,000 earlier in the year. That low represented a roughly 52% pullback from its all-time high of $122,000 reached last year — a correction that, by historical standards, was relatively contained. Past cycles saw declines of 80% to 90% from peak. The smaller drawdown this cycle has been widely attributed to the stabilizing influence of institutional ownership through regulated vehicles.

 

The inflow pattern itself tells a story. Exchange balances have stayed relatively flat while ETF custodians accumulate, suggesting the capital flowing in isn't being deployed through spot crypto exchanges. These are investors using traditional brokerage accounts and registered vehicles, the pension funds, registered investment advisors, and wealth managers who entered the market only after last year's ETF approvals made it operationally feasible.

 

Three consecutive days of $1.1 billion in net inflows at the end of February set the pace. IBIT alone captured roughly $652 million over that stretch. Fidelity's FBTC and Ark Invest's ARKB recorded positive flows too, though significantly smaller.

 

Whether the inflow trend holds depends partly on what happens at the Federal Reserve. On March 18, the Fed will announce its latest interest rate decision. Markets have been pricing in at least a pause in rate hikes after the central bank eased its tightening stance in late 2025, and any signal of cuts could accelerate flows into risk assets including crypto.

 

There's also the regulatory backdrop. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which would formally divide crypto assets into SEC-regulated securities and CFTC-regulated commodities, remains stalled in the Senate after a markup was delayed in January with no rescheduled date. Clarity on that front would likely deepen institutional participation further. Until then, ETF flows remain the clearest signal of where the institutional money is going.

 

Right now, it's going into Bitcoin.